Don’t Leave Money on the Table
Every government contractor has the same nightmare: losing a contract because you were 500K on the table. Price-to-win analysis is how you find that sweet spot where you beat your competition without giving away your profit. The hard truth: Most companies either bid too high and lose winnable deals, or bid too low and win contracts that don’t make money. Winners do their homework and price strategically.Companies that do serious price-to-win analysis win 40% more deals and average 15% higher profit margins than those who guess at pricing.
The Four Things You Need to Know
Intelligence That Actually Matters
What They Think It Should Cost
The government’s internal estimate - your starting point for understanding their budget expectations and pricing reality.
What Others Actually Charged
Real contract awards for similar work - the truth about market pricing that beats guessing every time.
How Your Enemies Will Price
Competitor pricing patterns and strategies - know what you’re up against before you set your price.
How Much Money They Really Have
The actual budget (not the estimate) - because bidding above what they can afford guarantees you lose.
Find Out What Really Happens
Get the Real Numbers
Stop guessing what contracts cost - here’s how to find out what actually happened:What Similar Work Actually Cost
What Similar Work Actually Cost
Where to Look:
- USASpending.gov shows every contract award and dollar amount
- Agency websites often publish award announcements with pricing
- Industry publications report on major contract awards
- Your network knows what their competitors bid and won
- Price per person or unit of work (gives you a baseline)
- How prices changed over time (are they going up or down?)
- Small business vs big company pricing (set-asides can be 20% higher)
- Location differences (DC area costs more than everywhere else)
How the Current Guy Is Doing
How the Current Guy Is Doing
Why This Matters:
- If they’re doing great, the customer won’t want to risk change
- If they’re struggling, you have an opportunity to be the solution
- Their pricing becomes your baseline - can you beat it?
- Their problems become your selling points
- Contract modification records show scope changes and problems
- Government people will tell you if the incumbent is performing well
- Industry contacts know who’s struggling and who’s succeeding
- Conference presentations reveal customer satisfaction levels
How This Agency Actually Spends Money
How This Agency Actually Spends Money
The Reality Check:
- They might say 8M (budget vs. reality)
- Some agencies always negotiate down, others pay full price
- Payment timing affects your cash flow and pricing
- Multi-year money is better than single-year funding
- Congressional budget documents show the real funding
- Agency financial reports reveal spending patterns
- Program managers know their actual budget constraints
- Past vendors know how they actually pay and when
Figure Out What Your Competition Will Do
The most important intelligence you can get: how will your competitors price this deal? Know Their Cost Structure:- What do their people actually cost? (Check Glassdoor, industry reports, your former employees)
- How much overhead are they carrying? (Public companies report this, small businesses usually run leaner)
- Do they use expensive subcontractors or cheaper internal staff?
- Are they based in expensive locations or low-cost areas?
- Do they usually bid low and try to make money on changes? Or price high and deliver premium?
- How desperate are they? (Company struggling financially will bid dangerously low)
- Do they have relationship advantages that let them price higher?
- What contracts have they won recently and what did those tell you about their strategy?
- Will they focus on price or technical excellence?
- Do they have something unique that commands a premium?
- Are they likely to take a loss to break into this customer?
- What partnerships might they form to improve their position?
Find Your Winning Price
The Three Numbers That Matter
Every price decision comes down to three questions:1
What's the Lowest You Can Go?
Your Price Floor:
- All your costs plus the minimum profit you need to survive
- Don’t forget cash flow - can you afford to wait for government payment?
- Include the cost of winning (proposal costs, startup, etc.)
- Add a buffer for the unexpected problems that always happen
2
What's the Most They'll Pay?
Their Price Ceiling:
- What the government thinks this should cost (their internal estimate)
- How much money they actually have (not always the same thing)
- What similar contracts cost (the market reality check)
- What it would cost them to do nothing or pick an alternative
3
Where Should You Price?
Your Sweet Spot:
- High enough to make good money but low enough to beat competitors
- Matches what the customer thinks is reasonable for the value
- Gives you room to negotiate if they come back with “your price is too high”
- Positions you for the long term, not just this one deal
The Reality of Winning vs Making Money
Here’s what actually happens at different price points:If You Price At | Your Odds of Winning | What This Means | Your Strategy |
---|---|---|---|
10% under their estimate | 85% chance | You’ll probably win but make very little money | Only if you’re desperate or this opens doors |
5% under their estimate | 70% chance | Good odds, decent margins | Smart aggressive pricing |
Same as their estimate | 50% chance | Coin flip - comes down to technical score | Best value play |
5% over their estimate | 30% chance | Uphill battle - better have superior solution | Premium positioning required |
10% over their estimate | 15% chance | Long shot unless you’re clearly the best option | Exceptional value needed |
The Math That Matters
Expected Value = (Your Odds of Winning × Your Profit) - (Cost of Bidding) Example:- Aggressive Pricing: 70% win odds × 1.4M expected value
- Premium Pricing: 50% win odds × 1.5M expected value
- Minus $200K in proposal costs = Premium pricing actually makes more money
Three Ways to Win With Pricing
When to Price Premium (and Get Away With It)
Charge more when you can prove you’re worth it:- You’re the only one who can do exactly what they need
- They’re scared of the technical risk and you have the proven solution
- Your past performance on similar work is clearly superior
- The cost of failure is much higher than the cost of your premium
- Show them what it costs when things go wrong (downtime, security breaches, delays)
- Prove your approach reduces their risk compared to cheaper alternatives
- Demonstrate the long-term savings from doing it right the first time
- Use your past performance to prove reliability worth paying for
When to Play the Value Game
Best approach when price matters but isn’t everything:- The evaluation gives equal weight to technical merit and cost
- You have real technical advantages but aren’t the only qualified company
- Multiple strong competitors means you can’t price too aggressively
- Customer wants the best value, not necessarily the lowest price
- Price competitively but not ridiculously low
- Focus your energy on showing superior value and outcomes
- Quantify the benefits of your approach vs. competitors
- Target the sweet spot where you’re competitive but profitable
When to Go for the Throat
Price aggressively when you have to:- The evaluation is heavily weighted toward cost (70%+ of the scoring)
- Requirements are straightforward with low technical risk
- You have genuine cost advantages (location, efficiency, partnerships)
- You need this contract to break into a new customer or market
- Be absolutely sure you can deliver profitably at this price
- Have contingency plans for the problems that will definitely happen
- Focus on operational efficiency and lean project management
- Plan to make money on follow-on work or contract modifications
Customer Budget Intelligence
Understanding Budget Reality
Go beyond published estimates to understand true funding: Budget Research Sources:- Congressional budget justifications and hearings
- Agency financial management reports
- Program budget exhibits and documentation
- Multi-year procurement and funding profiles
- Total available funding vs. published estimates
- Multi-year funding availability and timing
- Budget pressures and potential reductions
- Alternative funding sources or mechanisms
Funding Timing and Structure
Align pricing with customer funding realities:Single-Year Funding
Single-Year Funding
Considerations:
- All costs must fit within fiscal year budget
- Limited flexibility for cost growth or changes
- Front-loaded pricing may be preferred
- Payment terms impact on cash flow
- Conservative pricing with minimal risk
- Clear scope boundaries and change procedures
- Payment milestone alignment with deliverables
- Working capital considerations for cash flow
Multi-Year Funding
Multi-Year Funding
Considerations:
- Funding profile across multiple years
- Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) provisions
- Budget uncertainty in out-years
- Congressional appropriation risks
- Base year aggressive, option years conservative
- EPA clauses to manage inflation risk
- Pricing flexibility for scope adjustments
- Performance incentives tied to funding levels
Incremental Funding
Incremental Funding
Considerations:
- Partial funding with incremental additions
- Performance risk if funding not received
- Stop-work scenarios and implications
- Contractor financing requirements
- Higher margins to account for funding risk
- Clear stop-work and restart procedures
- Milestone-based funding and deliverables
- Working capital buffers for gaps
Risk-Adjusted Pricing
Pricing Risk Factors
Account for risks in your pricing strategy: Technical Risk Factors:- Unproven technology or approaches
- Integration complexity and interfaces
- Performance specification uncertainties
- Regulatory or compliance requirements
- Aggressive schedule requirements
- Resource availability constraints
- Subcontractor performance dependencies
- Geographic or security challenges
- Customer payment history and terms
- Working capital requirements
- Currency or inflation exposure
- Contract modification likelihood
Risk Mitigation Pricing
Build risk mitigation into pricing: Contingency Planning:- Technical risk reserves for unknowns
- Schedule buffers for critical path activities
- Cost reserves for scope uncertainty
- Management reserves for unforeseen issues
- Performance bond requirements and costs
- Professional liability insurance needs
- Cyber security insurance considerations
- Key person insurance for critical staff
Advanced PTW Techniques
Monte Carlo Analysis
Use statistical modeling for complex pricing scenarios: Variables to Model:- ICE estimate ranges and probability distributions
- Competitor pricing behavior patterns
- Customer budget flexibility scenarios
- Performance risk impact ranges
- Win probability distributions across price ranges
- Expected value calculations with confidence intervals
- Risk-adjusted return scenarios
- Sensitivity analysis for key variables
Game Theory Applications
Model competitor behavior and strategic interactions: Competitor Response Modeling:- How will competitors react to your pricing strategy?
- What information do competitors have about your costs?
- How do past bidding patterns predict future behavior?
- What are the implications of signaling strategies?
- First-mover advantages in pricing announcements
- Coalition building with teaming partners
- Market positioning for future competitions
- Long-term relationship value considerations
Portfolio Optimization
Consider PTW in context of overall business portfolio: Portfolio Balance Factors:- Risk distribution across contracts and customers
- Profit margin targets and business objectives
- Capacity utilization and resource allocation
- Strategic positioning and market development
- Shared resources and overhead allocation
- Learning curve benefits across similar contracts
- Customer relationship development value
- Market positioning and competitive intelligence
PTW Documentation and Approval
Analysis Documentation
Comprehensive PTW analysis should include: Market Intelligence Summary:- Comparable contract analysis and benchmarks
- Competitive pricing intelligence and assumptions
- Customer budget and funding intelligence
- Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
- Recommended price and supporting rationale
- Alternative pricing scenarios and trade-offs
- Win probability analysis and expected value
- Strategic positioning and messaging implications
- Senior management review and approval
- Finance and contracts team validation
- Risk management assessment and sign-off
- Capture team alignment and buy-in
Pricing Decision Factors
Document key decision criteria:- Strategic Importance: How critical is this win to business objectives?
- Competitive Position: What pricing flexibility do market conditions allow?
- Risk Tolerance: What level of margin risk is acceptable?
- Resource Availability: How does pricing align with capacity and capabilities?
- Customer Relationship: What pricing supports long-term relationship goals?
Integration with Proposal Development
Pricing Message Development
Align pricing strategy with proposal messaging: Value Proposition Development:- Quantify benefits and return on investment
- Demonstrate cost savings and efficiency gains
- Highlight risk mitigation value
- Show total cost of ownership advantages
- Explain pricing methodology and approach
- Justify any premium pricing with value
- Address customer cost concerns proactively
- Provide cost transparency and breakdown
Competitive Pricing Intelligence
Use PTW analysis to inform competitive strategy: Ghosting Competitors:- Highlight cost risks competitors may not address
- Emphasize value areas where competitors weak
- Position pricing advantages strategically
- Address customer concerns about competitor pricing
- Technical approach supports pricing strategy
- Management approach demonstrates efficiency
- Past performance shows cost control capability
- Risk mitigation justifies pricing decisions